top of page

About ANA

The Argumentation Network of the Americas

The Argumentation Network of the Americas aims to unite, sustain, and grow the community of argumentation scholars across the Americas.

Our Story

ANA began when two recent PhD graduates, faced with finding their place in the North American job market, recognized the need for organized and sustained support. 

ANA's mission is to provide a network to connect the interdisciplinary argumentation studies community across North, Central, and South America with a specific aim to support students and early career researchers. This will be done through a periodic major conference, along with smaller regional events taking place more regularly. The main priority of the ANA executive is to make connections across the continents in efforts to support the the growth and development of researchers in the field. 

Meet The Executive

Michael Baumtrog Profile.jpg
Michael Baumtrog
Chair
baumtrog@torontomu.ca

Department of Law and Business - Toronto Metropolitan University, Canada.

Michael earned Undergraduate and Masters degrees in Philosophy from the University of Windsor. He earned his PhD in Philosophy from the New University of Lisbon, Portugal. His main research interests are in practical reasoning and argumentation, epistemic injustice and youth, and the concept and practice of agreement.

Constanza.png
Constanza Ihnen
Regional Director - South
cihnen@derecho.uchile.cl

Faculty of Law – University of Chile, Chile. 

Constanza has an undergraduate degree in Hispanic and Latin American Literature and Linguistics from the Catholic University of Chile. She earned her Master’s and PhD in Rhetoric, Argumentation and Philosophy of Language from the University of Amsterdam. She is currently interested in lawmaking and constitution-making discussion procedures and argumentation, legal arguments (about evidence in particular), and the descriptive and normative meaning of the term "force" when applied to arguments.

Sarah Partlow Lefevre.jpg
Sarah T. Partlow Lefevre
Regional Director - North
arahpartlowlefev@isu.edu

Department of Communication, Media, and Persuasion - Idaho State University, USA.

Sarah earned her Ph.D., from the University of Kansas in Communication and Rhetorical Studies. She is a Professor in the Department of Communication, Media, and Persuasion at Idaho State University where she has been the Director of Debate since 2001. She is interested in the intersection between argumentation and conspiracy theories, argumentation theory, presidential debates, debates about gun control, second wave feminism, and contemporary controversies in the public sphere.  Sarah is the Director of the National Debate Tournament. She also serves on the board of the Women’s Debate Institute and Kind Community Inc. in Pocatello. As part of her role for KIND, Sarah promotes respectful dialogue and debate in her local community.

Gustavo Arroyo
Regional Director - South
gjarroyo@yahoo.com.ar

National University of General Sarmiento, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Gustavo holds three degrees in Philosophy, including an undergraduate from the National University of Rosario (Argentina), a Master's from the University of Campinas (Sao Paulo, Brazil) and a PhD from the Free University of Berlin (Germany). Gustavo has been a member of the Mexican Academy of Logic, and he is currently a member of the Argentinian Society of Analytic Philosophy (SADAF). Since 2023, he has been a part of the editorial board of the journal Topoi. Gustavo's academic interests span the theory of concepts and definitions, with a specific focus on the challenges involved in arguing about definitions within both academic and social contexts. Additionally, he is intrigued by philosophical argumentation and deeply engaged in exploring the problem of deep disagreements.

CWoods_2023-2.jpg
Carly Woods
Regional Director - North
cswoods@umd.educl

Department of Communication - University of Maryland, USA.

Carly earned M.A. and Ph.D. degrees in Communication and a graduate certificate in Women's Studies from the University of Pittsburgh. Her research focuses on gender, race, and nation in argumentation and debate. Carly is the author of Debating Women: Gender, Education, and Spaces for Argument, 1835-1945 (Michigan State University Press) and is currently working on a book manuscript on international argumentation and higher education in the 1920s. 

hugo-ribeiro-mota-pressebilde.jpeg
Hugo Mota
Graduate Rep. - South

Department of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and Ideas - University of Oslo, Norway.

Hugo earned an Undergraduate and Masters degrees in Philosophy from the Federal University of Pernambuco. He currently is a PhD candidate in Philosophy at the University of Oslo. His research is on social epistemology, specifically in the relation between deep disagreements, argumentation, and structural oppression.

DanielMejiaS.jpg
Daniel Mejía S
Graduate Rep. - North

 

Department of Philosophy - University of Windsor, Canada.

Daniel earned an Undergraduate degree in philosophy from Universidad de Antioquia and a Masters degree in Humanistic Studies from Universidad EAFIT. He is currently pursuing a PhD in Argumentation Studies at the University of Windsor. There he is part of the political argument research cluster and is doing research on extremism and argumentation under the supervision of Dr. Christopher Tindale.

WIN_20221121_13_57_41_Pro (3).jpg
Harry Weger-
Senior Advisor

Nicholson School of Communication and Media - University of Central Florida, USA.

Diego.jpeg
Diego Castro
Treasurer

Department of Humanities - Universidad Andrés Bello, Chile

Diego has an undergraduate degree in philosophy and another in law, both from the Catholic University of Chile. He earned his Master's degree in Philosophy at the University of Chile. He did his PhD in Philosophy at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands, focusing on the relationship between disagreement and argumentation. Currently, he is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Humanities of the Andres Bello University in Chile. Lately, he is interested in deliberation as a philosophical concept, and it's relationship with argumentation.

bottom of page